|
The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024
|
Latest message you have seen: RE: Re: Roof Insulation (Was Re: Halogens for thickies) |
[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: [ADVERT] Clipsal C-bus
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [ADVERT] Clipsal C-bus
- From: "Kevin Hawkins" <lists@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 17:45:10 -0000
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Greenwood [mailto:martin@xxxxxxx]
For these cat5-less switches can I run C-bus switches over existing
(isolated) switch wiring rather than Cat5?
Hi Martin - I'm going to be doing exactly this for the same reason - I
can
get at the cable and I'm effectively going to isolate and use it. In my
case
as 'C-Bus' although it should be twisted pair - it is in a metal
conduit
though so noise pickup should be minimal - you only need two wires
of
course regardless of the number of switches you have - which is nice -
It
does make it somewhat difficult to reinstate should you take your C-Bus
stuff with you if you move. In one case I have drawn out the cables from
a
switch as they were placed in a conduit - in fact two conduits so I left
one
in place (isolated) and ran the CAT5 down the other which was handy.
Alternatively leave all the wires in place and run to a bus coupler
either
above the switch or back at the consumer panel.
Kevin
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
List of UKHA Groups here - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/UKHA_Grouplists/
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|
|