The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

Latest message you have seen: Re: Smart Home Show 2007 - Final Video


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: RE: Windows XP Media Center Edition Review



The thing is as said in a previous thread PVRs are getting more powerful, so
why not have a P4 (apart from the cost issues at the moment).  When they
release the newier chips it'll become the older chips will be cheaper and it
wont be an issue anymore.  Aka why I said its only a matter of time before
settop boxes are released.

Kind Regards,
Chris Bond
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kenneth Watt" <kwatt@xxxxxxx>
To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 10:24 AM
Subject: RE: RE: [ukha_d] Windows XP Media Center Edition Review


> > Isn't this just like any STB? Sure it'll be a little bit more
> powerful,
> > but the idea of the media PC is that it's a PC as well, that's back
> > tracking into what we have now.
>
> Here's the question I keep asking though...
>
> When is an STB not an STB and a PC or when is a PC an STB? ;)
>
> Is TiVo, for example, a Linux based PC for TV or is it an STB that just
> happens to run Linux at its core?
>
> The lines are getting blurred on this more and more as every new device
> appears IMO.
>
> > Your loosing the PC element of the media PC, the next generation of
> PVRs
> > will have more power to cope with the tasks as well, but if the tiny
> > spec that's inside a tivo can handle TV pausing and recording without
> > strain, why does it take something like a p4 2.53gig to do it?
>
> Quite, something I was wondering myself.
>
> >This is the horses for courses argument, and without a doubt a
> dedicated >device will always do a better job at something than a PC
> trying to do 50 >tasks at once plus the TV components.
>
> Exactly, but again with reference to the above, why can't it with that
> kind of power?
>
> > Oh and if it crashed when it was recording something I would be less
> > than impressed.
>
> Definitely not the way to go! ;)
>
> K.
>
>
>
> http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx > Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx > Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx > List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx >
> List of UKHA Groups here - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/UKHA_Grouplists/
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>



http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
List of UKHA Groups here - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/UKHA_Grouplists/


Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.