RE: SliMP3 or Audiotron owners wanting display capability

["Paul Gale" <groups@xxxxxxx>]

Not knowing much about both - are they up to dealing with large numbers
of files (>30,000)?



Paul.



-----Original Message-----
From: Rob Mouser [mailto:rmouser@xxxxxxx] 
Sent: 14 January 2003 13:09
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] SliMP3 or Audiotron owners wanting display
capability



Just while were on that subject has anyone tried any of the other web
interfaces, controllers for the AT? I don't much like the AT default
and
have tried the offering 'alternatron'. Just wandered what else people
were using? 

Many thanks

Rob Mouser
rmouser@xxxxxxx
rob@xxxxxxx

> -----Original Message-----
> From: roaming@xxxxxxx [mailto:roaming@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 14 January 2003 13:09
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] SliMP3 or Audiotron owners wanting display
> capability
> 
> Hi Kevin,
> 
> Quoting Kevin Hawkins <lists@xxxxxxx>:
>
>            
I think trying to get xAP support into the AT would be a
> > great option too although very much at the mercy of Turtle Beach
- I
> > might get in touch and see if there's any mileage here, As you
say
it is
> 
> From what I've seen of them on their support list, they seem to be
willing
> to
> listen to the users - though they won't of course implement
something
just
> for
> one person!
> 
> Your main problem I suspect is "selling" xAP to TB.
> There seem to be two routes to this:
> 1/ Talk to them direct
> 2/ Discuss it on their support list.  If there are enough
"me too"
voices
> asking for it, then TB will probably do it.  Of course, that
means
trying
> to
> explain xAP to a load of damn yanks on the list :-/
> 
> > just want to announce state and xAP is almost tailor made for
that.
To
> > just announce 'something's changed' would be trivial.  For a
full
blown
> > 'control' interface it's a little more involved for them but
still
in
> > the 'very do-able' class I think.
> 
> I think the best you could hope for is them pushing a message out
the
> right TCP
> port to tell you something has changed - there is already control
over
the
> AT
> via the HTTP interface, so they are unlikely to implement
_another_
> control
> mechanism....
> Getting the status back should be enough for someone to be able to
write a
> PC
> side app that controls the AT and receives xAP response messages
from
it.
> Said
> app could, of course also generate an xAP version of the command
it
sent
> for
> any interested xAP devices out there.....
> 
> just my 0.002p worth,
> 
> 
> Tony
> 
> http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
> List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
> 
> List of UKHA Groups here -
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/UKHA_Grouplists/
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> 


http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx 
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx 
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx 
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
List of UKHA Groups here -
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/UKHA_Grouplists/

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> 
Terms of Service. 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx 
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx 
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx 
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
List of UKHA Groups here - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/UKHA_Grouplists/

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.