RE: [OT] Website styling

[ian.bird@xxxxxxx]

Speaking as someone whose website is simply a portal for my interests I
went with simple. Frames was one of the first topics in the book I bought
and it seemed to do what I wanted so I used it.

I would like to add some 'nice' menus sometime but building all my
embedded projects and family commitments take up more time than I have
currently. I don't have a Windoze programming background other than stuff
I have taught myself so everything seems to take ages at the best of
times.

Ian







"Gerard McGovern" <stuff@xxxxxxx>
20/06/2003 09:50
Please respond to ukha_d


To:     <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
cc:
Subject:        RE: [ukha_d] [OT] Website styling


> So the question is do people prefer the php news and topics
> style sites or a more traditional pages, frames and side
> menus type site like say Ian Bird's or Keith's. (Sorry guys
> just the first two I thought of)

Whatever you use do NOT use frames under any circumstances. There are
only a handful of sites in the world that actually *need* frames.

G





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]