[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: MV1000 and motion detection (Bug ?)
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: MV1000 and motion detection (Bug ?)
- From: "Rowdy" <aoop43@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 22:37:07 +0100
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
I notice in the manual appendix C it talks about ftp and it mentions in
the sample the gallery file name html. I wonder if you can get in and
edit that file, as long as you then don't click on the create gallery
page button I assume it won't get overwritten? I've tried to connect to
my box, but I'm not very familiar with ftp and can't seem to get it to
work.
Keith Y
-----Original Message-----
From: Nigel Giddings [mailto:nigel.giddings@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 21 May 2003 21:20
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] MV1000 and motion detection (Bug ?)
Keith,
I have also noticed strange behaviour with the Gallery page.
When I access the box from the LAN the gallery is fine, however, when I
access the gallery from the internet it does not provide the images in
the
gallery and when I click on the image space it looks for the ip address
(the
one allocated on the LAN 192.168.x.x not the URL). This causes me a
problem
as I use no-ip (dynamic dns) so the ip address is, well, dynamic...
Looks as
if I will have to set up a web page to present the images from the
internet.
Nigel
-----Original Message-----
From: Rowdy [mailto:aoop43@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 21 May 2003 14:48
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] MV1000 and motion detection
Paul,
Looks interesting, I assume the cameras don't have to have different IP
addresses, all that needs to be different is the file name on the end.
If so this is pretty good.
As an aside, been having a play with this today and I may have found a
bug, I changed my port number to something different and rebooted the
MV1000. Everything worked ok apart from the gallery which just showed as
request failed for the 1 camera I had. It looks like this bit of the
code doesn't include the port number so was defaulting to 80 and
therefore failing, only a minor point.
Anyway you really need to get some more cameras to test this out
thoroughly ;-)
Keith Y
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Smith [mailto:wheelbarrowhandle@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 21 May 2003 14:28
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: [ukha_d] MV1000 and motion detection
HI Guys,
I think most of you maybe interested in this. I have only tested
it with one camera at the moment, but so far it works well.
http://www.camsurveillance.com/
Just got to work out what cameras to get now.
Regards
Paul
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.483 / Virus Database: 279 - Release Date: 19/05/2003
** UKHA2004 BE THERE! ** - start planning now.
http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
** UKHA2004 BE THERE! ** - start planning now.
http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|