The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

Latest message you have seen: Re: Current Cost without display


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: LV Halogens AGAIN!



Frank

no the Cat5 was to give me the option to go Cbus as
someone else told me that Cat5 was all that was needed
at the switch for Cbus. If I go Cbus (awaiting news on
courses and pricing from Clipsal) I will just
disconnect T&E and leave it for if I ever move and
want to take HA kit with me.

Cheers
Mark

--- Frank Mc Alinden <fmcalind@xxxxxxx> wrote:

---------------------------------
Hi Mark


>My assumption is that this does not proclude Cbus >if
I decide to do a
>course and if I decide x10 I can stick a dinrail
>module in the fuse
>box and a momentary switch on the wall.

Are you intending on using the cat5 for the momentary
switch if you use x10 ???...I think the momentry input
on the x10 din modules is 240v ???

Frank


----- Original Message -----
From: mhctaylor
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 6:19 AM
Subject: [ukha_d] LV Halogens AGAIN!


Sorry about covering LV ground again but as a newbie
I havent quite
got used to the message traffic on this list yet and
searching it
takes some time on a vintage analogue connection :-)

I still have not made a decision on x10 or Cbus so
here is what I am
proposing to test out this weekend - I hope someone
will give it the
UKHA seal of approval or (more likely) put me
straight!

I am going to wire a circuit straight from fuse box
to switch and
fuse box to LV transformers. I will also run Cat5
>from
switch.

My assumption is that this does not proclude Cbus if
I decide to do a
course and if I decide x10 I can stick a dinrail
module in the fuse
box and a momentary switch on the wall.

So how did I do ??? :-)

Cheers
Mark



Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.