The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

Latest message you have seen: Re: Apple Announce New Mac minis - Media Player Perfection


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Almost OT : ANyone got MS Windows VPN Server working behind their NAT router ?


  • To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: Almost OT : ANyone got MS Windows VPN Server working behind their NAT router ?
  • From: "Iain Goodhew" <I.C.B.Goodhew@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 12:15:11 +0100
  • Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx

Yes, I have done this but only with ms pptp protocol. As far as I
understand it l2tp with ipsec won't work with nat. something to do with
change the packet addresses and the ipsec is no longer valid.



I have a netgear router, and I only have to forward tcp 1723 to the vpn
server. This is used to setup the vpn link and do the authentication.
Once setup, all traffic passes using ip protocol 50 (I think), but the
netgear seems to pass this with needing a specific rule.



Iain



-----Original Message-----
From: Gareth Cook [mailto:g@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 04 June 2003 11:57
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: [ukha_d] Almost OT : ANyone got MS Windows VPN Server working
behind their NAT router ?



Says it all really - I want a VPN Connection to home so I can securely
run
HA stuff without passing credentials in the clear.

Thing is , I'm not having much success. Never gets passed the
authentication piece.

Cheers !

G.

Gareth Cook
BTPM North Region
IBM SWG - BTE Office - Lotus Park, Staines, TW18 3AG
Office: +44 (0)1784 445166 - Mobile: +44 (0)7980 445166
AIM Chat : TheBoyG - MSN Chat : chat@xxxxxxx
email: g@xxxxxxx



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]







Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.