The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

Latest message you have seen: RE: Different false alarms


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Re: FW: [HOMEVIS] The coolest piece of hardware ever



> well, it seems to provide much more than just a webserver.

This is certainly true.

> The device's Product Brief shows a diagram with a fairly complete
protocol
> set, (certainly, UDP is there in the stack) and the embedded
controller has
> both memory and CPU cycles to spare for a simple application, such as
an xPL
> client. Lantronix seem to be calling it "web enabled" simply
for the
> buzz-word factor, and possibly to try to grab the "world's
smallest web
> server" title.. In essence though , it's just "ethernet in a
box"

It's as Patrick has already said very similar to a rabbit, a little
smaller, and without some of the IO capabilities.

> Single Unit price seems to be 45 USD, if you can find a distributor
who
> actually has stock to ship!! It seems this product isn't quite in full
> production yet, or not in quantity at distributors ay any rate.

I think it's a classic case of marketing getting ahead of the game.

> how much is a rabbit core with ethernet?

Depends which unit, and at what volume, but the 2200 is $55 for 1off.
However I can tell you that like the Wiznet developer software Ian Bird has
talked
about the developer software for X-Port is likely to be close to $1000, I
could of
course be proved wrong on this.

Regards

Stuart


http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/




Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.