Re: [OT]

["Alancc" <alan.cc@xxxxxxx>]

Thanks for the advice guys.

SWMBO had her eyes set on an HP Photosmart printer which churns out photo
size prints, then she wouldn't have to switch on the computer thingy :-)
I expect to use one of these would be even more expensive per print.

She is an angel though, there's a Dell sat nav jobbie sitting in the hall
waiting to be wrapped up, she wont let me play with it :-(

Any thoughts on the new Canon Ixus 400 camera, iv'e used the 3.2meg one and
found it to be very good.

Alancc


----- Original Message -----
From: Phil Harris <phil@xxxxxxx>
To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2003 10:22 PM
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] [OT]


>
> > Goota go with Phil on this one. My inlaws have got a digital
camera and
I
> > offered to print out 30 odd prints for them on my Epson C82.
> > Although it did
> > take forever and the prints were OK quality, I ordered a set of
onlines
> > prints and was surprised at the increase in quality.
>
> Plus the online prints will be proper photographic quality and won't
fade -
> also, I believe that with some of the online companies you can allow
others
> (i.e. family and friends) to view your uploaded albums and choose what
> prints they want for themselves.
>
> > Well worth the money and a lot cheaper than £100 on a new
printer! £100
=
> > 500 prints!
>
> Remember that your calculation doesn't include the costs for paper and
ink
> which I reckon comes to more than 20p for a 5x7 print or the hassle of
> fitting three prints to a sheet of A4 and then having to cut them out.
>
> Phil
>
>
>
> UKHA 2004: 15th and 16th May 2004
>
> http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
> List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>