[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: cctv time and date
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: cctv time and date
- From: "Phil Harris" <phil@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 00:08:35 +0100
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
As far as I understand it isn't ...
...I'm pretty certain it has to be superimposed on the image. Audio
redubbing is easy to fake but a time and date generator is (I believe)
admissable.
Phil
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Campbell Macdonald [mailto:c.macd@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 16 October 2003 00:01
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: [ukha_d] cctv time and date
>
>
> Recently we had another bit of hassle which led to 2 youths being
> charged with damaging my neighbours car. My neighbour had cctv of
> incident and I had cctv of them running away then stopping
> outside my house.......why do they call each other by name :-)
> (one of them called the one guys first name, another called the
> same guys surname...and all as clear as day on the tape).
>
> Getting to the point, the video tapes cannot be used directly as
> evidence as they have no date and time, but were used to
> apprehend them, along with neighbours id.
>
> I have now added audio from homeseer to the left channel on the
> video, which announces date and time whenever the record is
> activated....the camera audio is on the right channel.
>
> The question is..........is an audio date and time good enough if
> required for court evidence.
>
> Campbell
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> UKHA 2004: 15th and 16th May 2004
>
> http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
> List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|