The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re: X10 Motion detection



Not quite true. You are correct as far as you go but occupancy ones tend
to be a lot more sensitive than the 'standard' ones and of course a bit
more expensive. A lot of them have different fields of view too e.g.
overhead looking down 360 type. Lots of choices ;-))

Ian






"Marcus Warrington" <marcusw@xxxxxxx>
21/06/2004 14:02
Please respond to ukha_d


To:     <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
cc:
Subject:        [ukha_d] Re: X10 Motion detection


Thanks to everyone for the advice on PIRs for room occupancy.

Since the only difference between occupancy and alarm PIR is the pulse
count, I assume that I could set them to trigger on a single pulse but
then set the "controller" (i.e. PC) to ignore any
"false" single counts ?

I'm thinking of also putting some IR receivers (and possible transmitters)
in the ceiling, can these be run on the same piece of cat5e as the PIR
(like running Telephone and Ethernet over a single cat5e cable) ?

Thanks

Marcus






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




UKHA_D Main Index | UKHA_D Thread Index | UKHA_D Home | Archives Home

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.