Re: The PABX works!

[Pete Shew <ukha_d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

*OK - http://tinyurl.com/5mgpz

Pete
*
Frank Mc Alinden wrote:

>Hi Pete
>
> It works! My rebuild of my PBX is working fine and better than before.
>
>
>>My Omnicom FS2828 died so I lobotomised it and threw a couple of
PICs at
>>it and now it does a better job than before
>>
>>
>
>PICS ;-)))
>
>Frank
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Pete Shew" <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
>To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
>Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 8:08 PM
>Subject: Re: [ukha_d] The PABX works!
>
>
>
>
>>It works! My rebuild of my PBX is working fine and better than
before.
>>My Omnicom FS2828 died so I lobotomised it and threw a couple of
PICs at
>>it and now it does a better job than before. A much better, to my
mind,
>>human interface for domestic use then the original.
>>
>>I felt I had to share my feelings of success :-)
>>
>>OK - I know everyone is talking about VOIP these days, but VOIP
phones
>>aren't cheap and they are overkill for the purpose. Asterisk would
have
>>been nice, but the FXS interfaces are too pricey. My answerphone
uses a
>>Dialogic card in a Windows PC with RYO software to email messages.
>>
>>What I need to do now is to link the answerphone to the PBX to
allow
>>turning on the message waiting lights, or maybe putting up Asterisk
with
>>a link to the PBX.so I can use Asterisk Answerphone and VOIP
routing
>>features. It would have to be a jigged FXO card though because
they're
>>cheap, like me.
>>
>>Onwards ...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>