The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

Latest message you have seen: RE: C-Bus Wireless


[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: [OT] PCB "supplier", cheap source for amateur projects required?


  • Subject: Re: [OT] PCB "supplier", cheap source for amateur projects required?
  • From: "Ian Bird" <ian.bird@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2004 17:12:57 -0000

Ahhh, found it. Here it is.....

>From Gerber or graphics files:
single-sided undrilled boards - 10p per sq cm
double-sided undrilled boards - 15p per square cm
drilling (>0.6mm hole size) - additional 5p per square cm
tinning - additional 5p per square cm
(All + VAT)

These boards are hand made, so no silk screen, solder resist or PTH.
<=3D 0.3mm track and gap is recommended, but 0.2mm is doable.

Postage is =A35, so it's worthwhile getting a few boards done at the=20
same
time. Having said that, it's still much cheaper than the likes of PCB=20
Pool.

Oh, you also get the boards back in 1 or 2 days! Much easier than=20
farting
around for hours making your own (like I have been) or using strip=20
board.
:-)

andy@xxxxxxx for more info.


Ian






--- In ukha_d@xxxxxxx, ian.bird@c... wrote:
>=20
> The final option is home made. Someone posted something about a guy=20
who was
> offering this as a service for a very reasonable rate. If you are
> interested I will hunt it out but it is on the other PC and I am=20
packing
> for a business trip at the moment. Depending on your needs I could=20
even put
> something together for you.
>=20
> What PCB software do you use? (assuming you do if you are planning=20
to go
> for a professional prototype).
>=20
> Ian
>=20
>=20




UKHA_D Main Index | UKHA_D Thread Index | UKHA_D Home | Archives Home

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.