The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

RE: RGB to.....?


  • Subject: RE: RGB to.....?
  • From: "Keith Doxey" <ukha@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 12:10:26 +0100

Hi Tony,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tony Butler [mailto:lists@xxxxxxx]
> > Because usually the minimum frequency that a VGA port has to
> > accept is 31kHz ... Generally the "domestic" series
plasmas
> > seem to accept 15kHz (or above) up their VGA port whereas the
> > "commercial" series plasmas seem to accept 31kHz (or
above).
>
> But WHY dad? Isn't vga a standard, so they should all be pretty much
the
> same?
>

Back in the dim and distant past of PC's, VGA *WAS* a standard as were CGA,
EGA etc

VGA (Video Graphics Array) originally was 640x480 31kHz Horizontal 60Hz
Vertical.

The connector was a 15pin high Density D Connector (15HD) or 5 x BNC

As graphics technology increased higher resolutions began to appear and
were
also named

SVGA (Super Video Graphic Array) 800 x 600
XGA (eXtended Video Graphics Array) 1024 x 768

... but then things started ot get silly, technology moved so fast that
multiple refresh rates became available and also much higher resolutions
and
aspect ratios. Various other acromyms started to appear for resolutions but
generally then now only give an indication to the resolution rather than
the
SCAN frequencies.

The term VGA stuck for the connector as a generic term for the PC's
Graphics
output connector in much the same way as "Hoover" is used a
generic term for
Vacuum Cleaners when in reality it is actually a brand name for a
manufacturer. Most families will "Hoover" the carpets despite
their vacuum
cleaner being Dyson, Electrolux, Vax, Panasonic etc.

Hope that helps

Keith




UKHA_D Main Index | UKHA_D Thread Index | UKHA_D Home | Archives Home

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.