Re[10]: RE: RFID Human Implants - Occupancy Detection

["Pete Shew" <ukha_d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

To get a response he must have been sending quite a pulse. Were the cows
cooked by the radiation from the reader - two birds with one stone?

Pete

*********** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***********

On 10/02/2005 at 08:56 Ward, David wrote:

>Yikes! What size transformers did that gear make?!
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jon Whiten [mailto:jon@xxxxxxx]
>Sent: 09 February 2005 16:50
>To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
>Subject: RE: Re[8]: [ukha_d] RE: RFID Human Implants - Occupancy
>Detection
>
>
>
>18 months ago I sold some transformer winding gear to a guy who
>had a system
>that could scan RFIDs in Cattle from a range of several feet.
>He was also
>looking at an application of the same whereby pets could be
automgically
>scanned as their owners carried them into the Vet's surgery.
>
>His original business had something to do with RFID tags on
>serviced laundry
>(Table cloths/curtains/etc.)
>
>J
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Pete Shew [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx]
>Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2005 8:21 PM
>To: UKHA
>Subject: Re[8]: [ukha_d] RE: RFID Human Implants - Occupancy Detection
>
>
>I've never looked at a patent application before. I had always
>assumed that
>there had to be both a novel idea and a liklihood of it being
practical.
>There is no evidence provided which indicates that the system
>would elicit a
>reliable response from the sub-dermal responder at the range required.
A
>large dog is shown in the drawing.
>
>Am I wrong, is the only requirement novelty?
>
>Pete
>
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>