The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

RE: [OT] Audio Ripping


  • Subject: RE: [OT] Audio Ripping
  • From: "Simon Brazier" <zen17047@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 19:20:36 -0000


The entire collection that I lost was done in Windows Media Lossless - but
the only problem is that there isn't any media streamers that can play the
format. As I'd like to start having multi-room audio, it makes sense to go
for WAV as there are media streamers that can handle this format.

Having said that though, I quite like the idea of Apple Lossless mentioned
in one of the other replies, and using XLobby / Winamp as the front end.


_____

From: Ben McCormack [mailto:ben@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 15 February 2005 16:05
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ukha_d] [OT] Audio Ripping


Have you looked at any lossless compression formats?


With WAV each CD is going to take up 650Mb.

There are a number of lossless formats

FLAC

http://www.firstpr.com.au/audiocomp/lossless/


Ben

On 15 Feb 2005, at 15:59, Simon Brazier wrote:

>
> Having just lost nearly 90Gb of music files in a hard disk failure
> (the day after purchasing some backup software which had yet to be
> installed), and data recovery programs failing to recover anything,
> I've got to start encoding all of my CDs to hard disk again.
>
> I was thinking of doing them all to WAV this time for maximum quality.
> Anyone got any recommendations for a good CD to WAV ripper ? I've had
> a look through the archive and it's about 6 months since this was last
> mentioned so there might be newer solutions around.
>
> TIA
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>








UKHA_D Main Index | UKHA_D Thread Index | UKHA_D Home | Archives Home

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.