RE: was [ot] processors, especially mobile processors now silly

["christopher purves" <CHRIS_PURVES@xxxxxxx>]

Yes but I seem to remember a discussion a while ago about the ammount of
off-topic vs on-topic emails. The group is in danger of becoming purely off
topic which would be a great shame - to explain my feelings further .....

A lot of the off-topic stuff is fairly relevent so I don't want to do an

email  grep '[ot]'  /dev/null

as I will miss interesting things. IMHO that is

>> what latop should I buy

is soooo vanilla that it really has no business here even under [ot].

Maybe a [not-too-ot]  is required ? :)

Just my 2 pence and not meant to be flamey (or even slightly warm).

Chris
(under pain of death that new CBUS and whole-house-audio-system  must WORK)


----Original Message Follows----
From: "UKHA" <ukha@xxxxxxx>
Reply-To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: RE: was  [ukha_d] [ot] processors, especially mobile  processors
now silly
Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 16:56:16 +0100



On 07/01/2005 at 15:37 christopher purves wrote:

>Firstly sorry about the flame - was in a bad mood (a laptop is total
>overkill BTW go for something cheap)

You should also slap yourself and re-read the 'rules' for the group ... You
should also note that Stephen did have [ot] in the topic - ok, it was lower
case, but at least it was there...

now, go lie down in a darkend room and breathe deeply ;)

Andy