The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

Latest message you have seen: Re: [ADVERT] Lantronix serial server - last few left


[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

RE: RFID Human Implants - Occupancy Detection


  • Subject: RE: RFID Human Implants - Occupancy Detection
  • From: "Ward, David" <DAvid.Ward@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 08:18:40 -0000


Good old fashioned British 'eccentric professors'

Our Cats had this done years ago, and personally I think our cats do more
USEFUL work for cyber-science than Mr Warwick
(which reminds me, I really must write that decoder software for the cheap
RFID readers I bought last year)

I notice it doesn't mention anything about the read/write distance

Roll on the time when RFIDs are common in supermarkets (Free RFID tags) and
the price of readers falls significantly

D

-----Original Message-----
From: A.Agiannidis [mailto:besmart@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 26 January 2005 16:19
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] RFID Human Implants - Occupancy Detection



Not entirely accurate. First such implant was done back in 1999 by
Cybernetics Professor Kevin Warwick, Reading University.

http://www.cnn.com/TECH/computing/9901/14/chipman.idg/

For a detailed reference to his work including a recently implanted
electrode array allowing him to send and receive sensory signals :

http://www.kevinwarwick.com/


Thanos


_____

From: Mark McCall [mailto:lists@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 26 January 2005 15:04
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: [ukha_d] RFID Human Implants - Occupancy Detection


http://www.engadget.com/entry/1234000603029004/

All your occupancy detection problems sorted in a jiffy.  Now,
who's going
to go first?

:)

M.









UKHA_D Main Index | UKHA_D Thread Index | UKHA_D Home | Archives Home

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.