RE: Geovision & HA

["Paul Gale" <groups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I would go for the higher spec card definitely - in fact, I'm thinking
of upgrading anyway (if I can afford it!). I'll need to do this to run v8 -
and there are some nice features and improved interface design etc.

Paul.



-----Original Message-----
From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
christopher purves
Sent: 06 April 2006 16:40
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Geovision & HA

If you guys had the chance again would you still buy the same cards or
maybe
go for the 900/1000 ?

I'm thinking 800x16 probabkly running 8 cams to start for me.

Purpose built - brand new high spec machine.

Chris







>From: "Paul Gale" <groups@xxxxxxx>
>Reply-To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
>To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
>Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Geovision & HA
>Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 15:51:10 +0100
>
>640x480 as well. Interestingly the v8 version allows 720x576 IIRC.
>
>I also run the TCP and WEB server.
>
>Paul.
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
>Adrian
>Sent: 06 April 2006 16:23
>To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
>Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Geovision & HA
>
>Paul
>
>what resolution do you record at? 320x200 or 640x480? . My 3 are all
motion
>detect, 640x480, i am not normally logged into it(so just have the
>geovision
>login screen), i also have the webserver running (but would thought it
>would
>use much cpu if no-one was attached to it. I'll try adjusting bits an
>peices
>  and see if i can get it down then - my machine is higher spec than
yours
>so
>i would of thought it would run lower cpu
>
>Ade
>
>--------- Original Message --------
>From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
>To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
>Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Geovision & HA
>Date: 06/04/06 08:28
>
> >
> > I have a GV-650 card 8 camera version with 5 attached cameras. 4
working
>for this test. The card is 100fps max and I also have the DSP card.
> >
> > PC is P4 1.4GHz 768MB ram XP SP2
> >
> > It makes a BIG difference if you have the Geovision s/w full
screen
>showing the cams. I just did a test with all 4 cams recording 'around
the
>clock' and got:
> >
> > Full screen - DSP disabled - max 50% CPU
> > Full screen - DSP enabled - max 25% CPU
> >
> > Minimised - CPU drops a fair bit further.
> >
> > Don't know how having all 8 cams connected and either running
24/7
>recording or motion detect with several cams in detect state would
affect?
> >
> > I do see regular 100% utilisation when performing remote
maintenance and
>doing other stuff on it - so probably a bit under spec.
> >
> > I also don't do any audio recording - this would add a bit more
CPU
>time.
> >
> > Paul.
> >
>
>________________________________________________
>Message sent using UebiMiau 2.7.2
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>