The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

Latest message you have seen: Re: Low power PC option


[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

RE: [OT] recomended DNS services?


  • Subject: RE: [OT] recomended DNS services?
  • From: "K. C. Li" <li@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 23:03:15 +0100 (BST)

On Tue, 25 Apr 2006, Paul Gale wrote:

> In my experience over the last 6 months or so - I used to have backup
> mail when I was with Rapid then lost it when I moved to Ariel. I have
> definitely experienced more lost mail on several occasions when I've

If that is the case, some of the sending e-mail servers were probably not
properly configured or the retry periods were too short. Otherwise, no
e-mail should be lost at all. I often see outgoing e-mails queued up on
our e-mail server with automatic lengthening retry periods until the
maximum elapse time has been reached (set to 3 days currently for us).
Only then the queued e-mails are returned to the sender.

> been without it. It was a nice peace of mind to have - especially
> during those times where my server locked up etc - a reboot at it all
> came flooding back in :)

Yes, secondary e-mail servers do have their advantages but I maintain that
unless you have control over the UCE measures on them, they are merely
spam magnets. We have our own primary and secondary e-mail servers and
thus able to synchronise the two regarding UCE measures. In fact, our
secondary is stricter (it checks more RBLs) than the primary in an effort
to reduce the volume of spam that we receive daily.

Regards,

Kwong Li
li@xxxxxxx
Laser Business Systems Ltd.
http://www.laser.com
http://www.cbus-shop.com




UKHA_D Main Index | UKHA_D Thread Index | UKHA_D Home | Archives Home

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.