Re: Re: [OT] RJ45 splitters wanted

["David Yeend" <david.yeend@xxxxxxxxx>]

I think you mean something like this:

http://tinyurl.com/qd2q8

Seems quite expensive and puts the pair of connectors in a vertical stack
one above and one below positioned about the centre line of the original
socket. If I remember correctly they have an interesting latch release
mechanism where you lift the whole body to un-latch.

The example above is fully bridged - they have various configurations
available.

Hope this helps.

Regards,

David




On 8/31/06, johnandrewsinfo <groups@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>    what you want is a belkin passive hub:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/zsa5e
>
>
> --- In ukha_d@xxxxxxx <ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>, "Tim
Hawes"
> <timsyahoo@...> wrote:
> >
> > Kevin,
> >
> > A short patch lead, a straight through coupler and a side-by-side
> > splitter? Not very neat but it would do the job.
> >
> > Either that or ditch the patch lead & coupler and get some of
the B&Q
> > surface mount socket boxes and punch-down sockets. Run short
flying
> > lead from the wall socket and then punchdown the
"B&Q" sockets in a
> > daisy-chain fashion. Still not as neat as an integrated adaptor
though
> > :-(
> >
> > HTH,
> >
> > Tim.
> >
> > On 8/31/06, Kevin Hawkins <lists@...> wrote:
> > > I am after some RJ45 splitters (8 pin) - something that
plugs into an
> > > RJ45 socket and gives you two sockets from one, (rather like
the BT
> > > phone doublers). Sounds simple. The important thing is that
the two
> > > sockets are placed vertically above each other not side by
side as
> this
> > > would obscure adjacent sockets . Also I am not wanting
anything that
> > > moves the pins around - so not those ones that allow you to
run two
> > > Ethernet devices down one CAT5 cable by moving a couple of
pairs
> > > around. I have had a good trawl on the internet but not
found
> any yet
> > > (although plenty side by side or the Ethernet 2 from 1
type). So if
> > > anyone has any ideas please let me know...
> > >
> > > Kevin
> >
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]