[Message Prev][Message
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message
Index][Thread Index]
Re: Rubbish wireless performance
I originally had the same router. I've heard that this router is prone
to
hardware failure so guess it may be that.
I ended up replacing it with a Netgear DG834G and it hasn't caused (many)
problems since.
Hope you get on ok,
Mark
On 12/28/06, White, Peter <peter.white@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Nop, tried all the channels, and done a hard reboot, it's not
helped.
> I've
> plugged the Linksys WAG54G back in, and that's not got any dropouts,
so I
> guess it's some kind of weird hardware failure....I've logged a ticket
> with
> Netgear as the wait time on the phone was 30mins+ :-(
>
> Pete
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Darren Karp [mailto:darren.karp@xxxxxxx
<darren.karp%40aog.co.uk>]
>
> Sent: 28 December 2006 14:09
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx <ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Rubbish wireless performance
>
> Try changing the channel number
>
> _____
>
> From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx <ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:
> ukha_d@xxxxxxx <ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>] On Behalf Of
> White, Peter
> Sent: 28 December 2006 13:53
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx <ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: [ukha_d] Rubbish wireless performance
>
> Hi all, some advice please....
>
> For some reason, the wireless performance of my Netgear DG834PN has
gone
> very bad over the past couple of days and I can't work out why. As an
> example, here's a ping:
>
> Pinging 192.168.0.1 with 32 bytes of data:
>
> Reply from 192.168.0.1: bytes=32 time=3946ms TTL=64 Request timed out.
> Reply from 192.168.0.1: bytes=32 time=3ms TTL=64 Reply from
192.168.0.1:
> bytes=32 time=222ms TTL=64
>
> Rubbish. There's nothing new in Node 0, and the only neighbour within
> 50mtrs
> hasn't installed anything new either. This level of performance is
> constant
> (i.e. it's not just when the microwave or plasma is on), and moving
the
> router to a different room hasn't helped. All wireless clients are
acting
> the same, so it has to be at the router end of the connection. Wired
> connections are fine.
>
> Any ideas? I've got a Linksys that I'm going to try later (had to come
> into
> the office today) which, presumably, if it's the same will prove
there's
> an
> external influence at work, but won't help much more than that.
>
> Pete
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
UKHA_D Main Index |
UKHA_D Thread Index |
UKHA_D Home |
Archives Home
|