The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

Latest message you have seen: Re: The Owl


[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

RE: CBUS joy!


  • Subject: RE: CBUS joy!
  • From: "christopher purves" <CHRIS_PURVES@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2006 12:18:00 +0000

Talking of CBUS moments - I completed (ish) the programming of the
house
over the weekend. The results can only be described as stunning. Every room
is scene based. We had John Cullen (lighting design company) do the
lighting
diagrams for the house - read at least 4-5 lighting circuits per room  -
just looks gorgeous. Just about finiahed (95%) all the PIR programming too
so low level lights come on at night to light way to bathrooms etc.

Very **very** happy. Even the wife is happy.

Now putting the finishing touches to the system with the XAP gateway and a
little bit of homeseer and PAC programming.

Chris



>From: "Paul Gordon" <paul@xxxxxxx>
>Reply-To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
>To: "UKHA_D Group" <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
>Subject: [ukha_d] CBUS joy!
>Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 11:55:10 -0000
>
>At the weekend I finally got my *rse into gear and started my CBUS
>install.. - deep joy... Only got 1 light up & running so far (but I
did
>have to repaint an entire wall to make good where the old switches were
>removed...) but at least it's a start!
>
>Donwside is it appears to have killed a couple of X10 DIN modules that
are
>mounted right next to the CBUS Dimmer unit stone dead... - they work
fine
>on local control, but not by X10... - I assume the CBUS dimmer in close
>proximity is killing the X10 signal, - more reason for me to hurry up
&
>upgrade those to CBUS as well I guess...
>
>Quick question: - I'm just about to order up some more switches so I
can do
>precisely that, but I want to confirm that the square Saturns fit on
>bog-standard UK size single-gang backboxes?... - even the the 6-button
>ones?.. - the documentation for them says that they fit on standard
>backboxes, but doesn't explicitly say *what* standard!! - despite being
>called square, they look decidedly rectangular in any picture I can
find...
>- is that just because everyone is still using old pictures?
>
>Cheers.
>
>Paul G.
>
>
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>





UKHA_D Main Index | UKHA_D Thread Index | UKHA_D Home | Archives Home

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.