Re: Re: SWMBO caught me off guard!

[Andrew Kilgore <andrew.kilgore@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

Just wondering what all you display guru's make of the upcoming SED
displays
being developed by Canon and Toshiba. Will this finally equal or better
CRTs...? (On everything barr a price basis...!?!)

Thanks,
Andy.

On 1/5/06, Chris White <cmw@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> > Sorry, I think you're blaming the inadequacies of current
LCD/plasma
> > systems onto CRT.
> >
> > I have yet to see a Plasma or LCD system that is as good as a CRT
> > display. LCDs all seem to have a smeary quality about them which
CRTs
> > do not have, and both LCDs and plasmas seem to emphasise the
> > shortcomings of low bitrate mpegs. Often the pictures look
posterised
> > on LCD/plasma which I can only guess is due to some sort of
problem to
> > do with the method of making on/off only displays give an
illusion of
> > continuous tone.
> >
> > Although most domestic CRT displays don't have as high a
resolution as
> > the better panel displays, it is quite possible for CRTs to have
high
> > resolution. You will find that vision control in reputable
production
> > facilities is done on HR CRT displays, because they are the most
> > accurate form of monitoring available. Cheaper panel displays may
well
> > be used in areas were there is not such a need for good quality.
> >
> > This is not to say that flat panel displays won't equal CRTs at
some
> > time, they may well get there in the not to distant future, but
the
> > aren't there yet.
> >
> > Bill
> >
> Bill,
>
> I agree that the image quaility of the good CRT can be better than the
> best LCD/Plasma but they are two completely different ways of
> displaying the image. The issue with the flat panels is that they are
> to good at displaying what the receive, hence you give it an image
> that has passed through a high compression digital encoder and it will
> show you the inadequancies to the transmission standard rather than
> the screen. Some of the lower use Sky channels and freeview channels
> are appauling. But it is the compression rate of the MPEG standard
> rather than the panel itself
>
> This is why I have put up a high gain antenna to counter act the loss
> and interference caused by the off air transmission.
>
> With respect to the blurring of the image I agree that this is a
> problem with LCDs and Plasma and why I said in my original post that
> they are not so good for sport as their responce rate is to slow.
>
> Chris
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]