The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

RE: Recommend a mainboard for HA server


  • Subject: RE: Recommend a mainboard for HA server
  • From: "Paul Gale" <groups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 14:32:55 -0000

I already have a mac mini but it's no good for running as a HA server (too
=
slow and all my HA apps are PC based + I run Exchange server). I was just
a=
fter m/b recommendations.

Ta,

Paul.



> -----Original Message-----
> From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> Chris Hunter
> Sent: 14 January 2006 13:15
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [ukha_d] Recommend a mainboard for HA server
>=20
> How about (again) a Mac Mini ... ?
>=20
> Chris
>=20
>=20
>=20
> Andy Davies wrote:
>=20
> >What about Intel SE7210TP1-E? (Came across it yesterday when I was
> >looking through the list archives for stuff on media servers/raid)
> >
> >http://www.intel.com/design/servers/boards/SE7210TP1-E/
> >
> >Google turns up a few places that have them.
> >
> >Andy
> >
> >
> >Paul Gale wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>I=92ve been upgrading a couple of my work PC=92s over the last
few week=
s and
> now want to upgrade my slow W2K3 Server (HA Server). It=92s currently
a d=
ual
> 1 GHz P3. I have a spare P4 3 GHz and 2 GB RAM, so thought I=92d put
this=
in
> the server. It=92s socket 478.
> >>
> >>Anyone have any recommendations for a mainboard for this older
socket
> type for a server setup? It needs as many PCI slots as possible, G Bit
LA=
N
> etc.
> >>
> >>Thanks,
> >>
> >>Paul
> >>
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20




UKHA_D Main Index | UKHA_D Thread Index | UKHA_D Home | Archives Home

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.