The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

RE: Re: Windows MCE


  • Subject: RE: Re: Windows MCE
  • From: "Keith Finnett" <groups@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 22:29:59 -0000

And in fact if you want to avoid workarounds and make MCE join a domain
permanently, there are solutions out there to get the machine connected -
just Google or go to thegreenbutton.com!

k

-----Original Message-----
From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Sullivan, Glenn
Sent: 18 January 2006 20:02
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Re: Windows MCE

Yes it does.

But neither one of them objects to Win2K3 prompting for a valid
username, which can be presented as "domain\username".

For me, I just put a shortcut to a single line batch file in the startup
group of my XP Home/MCE machines:

net use \\Server\IPC$ /user:domain\username password

This authenticates them with a valid password to the IPC$ "share"
and
the credentials are cached from there...

HTH,

Glenn Sullivan, MCSE+I  MCDBA
David Clark Company Inc.

-----Original Message-----
From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Nick
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 2:44 PM
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: [ukha_d] Re: Windows MCE

Keith Finnett wrote:
>
> MCE is actually XP Pro with domain
> networking removed and the MCE
> app added...give or take...!
>

Not got around to looking at MCE yet, but does it seriously have the
domain networking nobbled like XP Home?  If it does then I wonder how
Bill G would expect me to plug it into my XP Pro and W2003 server
world where EVERYTHING ELSE authenticates against the domain?!?!!?

Odd!

Nick








UKHA_D Main Index | UKHA_D Thread Index | UKHA_D Home | Archives Home

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.