[Message Prev][Message
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message
Index][Thread Index]
Re: X10 CM12U failures
The year shouldn't make a difference - if it fails sooner than can be
reasonably be expected then the goods aren't fit for purpose and you have a
claim for repair/replacement
On 05/06/06, Keith Finnett <groups@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Unfortunately it's over a year old, and if they've not acknowledged a
> problem I doubt they'll care about my problem ;-)
>
> Unless you know otherwise......!
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> K.
> C. Li
> Sent: 05 June 2006 14:16
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] X10 CM12U failures
>
> On Mon, 5 Jun 2006, Keith Finnett wrote:
>
> > OK thanks. I've got Comfort with the X10 interface, so that can
do
> > some of the duties of the CM12U, but I have to do some pretty
complex
> > decisioning based on xAP weather data controlling an
X10-controlled
> > irrigation system, so I'll need more than an XM10U....grrrr....
>
> I would suggest returning the faulty unit for warranty replacement.
X-10
> have been informed a number of time of the overheating problem but
they
> have, so far, refused to believe there is one.
>
> Regards,
>
> Kwong Li
> li@xxxxxxx
> Laser Business Systems Ltd.
> http://www.laser.com
> http://www.cbus-shop.com
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
UKHA_D Main Index |
UKHA_D Thread Index |
UKHA_D Home |
Archives Home
|