The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

RE: TV licensing legality of a SlingBox ??


  • Subject: RE: TV licensing legality of a SlingBox ??
  • From: "Phil Harris" <phil@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 17:27:55 +0100

You absolutely sure about that?

I've got away with not having a TV license for several years (before I
aquired wife and sprog who do watch terrestrial TV) in the past by having a
video projector (no tuner), DVD player (no tuner), Laserdisc player (no
tuner) and semi-pro Panasonic S-VHS VCR (again, no tuner).

I was always told that it was the fact that I had nothing with a receiver
built in that meant I didn't have to have a license.

Phil

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Mal Lansell
> Sent: 15 June 2006 13:09
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [ukha_d] TV licensing legality of a SlingBox ??
>
> The licence is required for the device that is displaying a
> TV program - so a PC streaming TV from the web would require
> a licence, even if it doesn't have a tuner card.  However, I
> don't think the Slingbox itself would need to be covered by a
> licence, since it has no display (although there may be
> copyright issues with rebroadcasting a show across the internet).
>
> Mal
>
>
>
>
> Kevin Hawkins wrote:
>
> > I was extolling the virtues of a SlingBox to somebody
> yesterday ( a JP
> > who doesn't own a TV) as they would be interested in watching the
> > World Cup and they have a family who could provide the source.
They
> > asked me what the legality of such a solution would be with
> regard to
> > TV licensing. I believe the TV license is applied to the
> building (or
> > room in rented cases) that the viewer is located - or is it
perhaps
> > where the TV receiver is ... Now PC World didn't ask me my
address
> > when I bought the SlingBox so I'm guessing they are not obliged
to
> > inform TV Licensing
> > - but that doesn't make sense either as it does contain a
> FreeView TV
> > receiver.
> >
> > So what does anyone think of the legality of receiving a
> streamed TV
> > program at an address that doesn't have a TV licence, if say it
was
> > streamed from home (or in this case their sons home) ? I'm
guessing
> > it's not legal....and if so does that extend to not being legal
to
> > watch a Slongbox that you own and located at your own home
> but viewed
> > elsewhere. Do you think this person could buy (own) the
> Slingbox and
> > place it elsewhere and watch it at home ?
> >
> > K
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> --------------------~--> Yahoo! Groups gets a make over. See
> the new email design.
> http://us.click.yahoo.com/XISQkA/lOaOAA/yQLSAA/IBOolB/TM
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ------~->
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>




UKHA_D Main Index | UKHA_D Thread Index | UKHA_D Home | Archives Home

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.