Re: Fw: Sinking KAT5 into wall behind plasma

["Tim Hawes" <timsyahoo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Ahh :-((
Another cunning plan is called for.

Do you want to keep the fireplace for a real fire?

Tim.

On 3/10/06, Gareth Cook <g@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Should have explained - my house doesnt have wooden joists or floors.
It's
> steel beams with a solid concrete floor. The ceilings are all
suspended.
>
> Piccies on my site show it etc....
>
> G.
>
> ----- Forwarded by Gareth Cook/UK/IBM on 10/03/2006 17:57 -----
>
> Discussion
> Main Topic
>
> ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Today 17:33
>
> .
> Subject:
> .
> Re: Fw: [ukha_d] Sinking KAT5 into wall behind plasma
> .
> Category:
>
>
>
> No bright ideas - just a hole in the floor above :-)
> And yes you would have longer cables than if you mounted directly
> behind but probably no more than 2m max, provided you can locate the
> KAT5 boxes directly above the screen and come straight down the wall.
>
> I've got lots of holes in my floors (all covered with removable
> panels) from when I retrofitted my structured wiring. As long as the
> panels/boards are screwed down securely afterwards they don't squeak
> :-)
>
> Here's a pic from when I was re-wiring:
> http://tinyurl.com/qgto9
>
> There's plenty of space in the void. Unfortunately I don't have a pic
> of where the cables come up from in the wall below. Next time I have
> the floor up I'll take one :-)
>
> HTH,
>
> Tim.
>
> On 3/10/06, Gareth Cook <g@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > But then you'd have to allow for access somehow in the ceiling -
and
> this
> > also would increase the lengths of the av cable (ie output from
KAT5)
> >
> > Unless you have a bright idea Ive not thought of ?
> >
> > G.