The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Electricty Usage/Costs (Again)



Interesting, be useful to compile some comparisons, especially
multi-disk PC
server vs multi-disk RAID NAS like the Infrant etc.

My meagre datapoints ...

Mini-ITX (1Ghz C3) one disk running DSL+ Slimserver, OS via CF card:55W
running, 43W HD spun-down, 17W standby (bloody disgraceful). When I've got
time I need to sort out forced shutdown and WOL from Cortex.

Also just replaced IPCOP/Old PC (dunno but probably ~100W) with the 6-NIC
firewall device from LINITX (1GHz C3 again, CF card, 133MHz SDRAM) - 17W
running. Looks like it would have quite a reasonable payback period.

Can't believe these shutdown results, complete disgrace, I must see what my
household baseload is like with "shutdown" PCs and various device
chargers
etc through the night. I think it would pay to sort out some more automated
sockets...

It also makes the multiple HA servers via virtualisation on single fast PC
vs multiple slower PC question worth getting some data on.

Cheers,

David


On 9/20/06, John Benfield <john.benfield@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>   >
> >
> > >Another scary thing I noticed is that when the Dell PC was
shut down,
> it
> > was
> > >still using 14Watts?!?!
> >
>
> I recently measured my Dell and that pulls around 17watts when it's
> 'turned
> off'. It now gets turned off at the mains once it's finished it
powerdown
> cycle.
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




** Sponsored by www.BERBLE.com **
all the Cool Stuff, in one Place



UKHA_D Main Index | UKHA_D Thread Index | UKHA_D Home | Archives Home

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.