[Message Prev][Message
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message
Index][Thread Index]
Re: Electricty Usage/Costs (Again)
- Subject: Re: Electricty Usage/Costs (Again)
- From: "noel_pilot" <HA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 08:06:19 -0000
Hmm this is very interesting,
Firstly can I ask how people are measuing the power consumption of
individual items?!
Secondly - If I was to use an X10 applicance module plugged into a
socket with something plugged into it,would that use zero electricity
whilst the units off? or is the fact that the x10 applicance module is
listening for a signal means its going to be drawing some power?
I would like to go down the road of having applicance modules or
similar on all standby devices. At the moment I have one appliance
module then a four way extension lead into that which switches my tv,
xbox, dvd player etc, then i have another applicance module with my
airport express and amplifier plugged into that.
....when i say appliance modules i actually mean the ones with the
aerial on that pick up the signal from the remotes and put it onto the
powerline, but i intend to get some more proper appliance modules.
Was planning to start having my media server on 24/7 but was concerned
about the electricity, this topics enough to discourage me so might be
time to just get a NAS for the stuff I do need...'almost' all the time
and just put the media server on when i want to watch films!
Thanks
Noel
--- In ukha_d@xxxxxxx, "David Gumbrell"
<david.gumbrell@...>
wrote:
>
> Interesting, be useful to compile some comparisons, especially
multi-disk PC
> server vs multi-disk RAID NAS like the Infrant etc.
>
> My meagre datapoints ...
>
> Mini-ITX (1Ghz C3) one disk running DSL+ Slimserver, OS via CF
card:55W
> running, 43W HD spun-down, 17W standby (bloody disgraceful). When
I've got
> time I need to sort out forced shutdown and WOL from Cortex.
>
> Also just replaced IPCOP/Old PC (dunno but probably ~100W) with the
6-NIC
> firewall device from LINITX (1GHz C3 again, CF card, 133MHz SDRAM) -
17W
> running. Looks like it would have quite a reasonable payback period.
>
> Can't believe these shutdown results, complete disgrace, I must see
what my
> household baseload is like with "shutdown" PCs and various
device
chargers
> etc through the night. I think it would pay to sort out some more
automated
> sockets...
>
> It also makes the multiple HA servers via virtualisation on single
fast PC
> vs multiple slower PC question worth getting some data on.
>
> Cheers,
>
> David
>
>
> On 9/20/06, John Benfield <john.benfield@...> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > >Another scary thing I noticed is that when the Dell PC
was shut
down,
> > it
> > > was
> > > >still using 14Watts?!?!
> > >
> >
> > I recently measured my Dell and that pulls around 17watts when
it's
> > 'turned
> > off'. It now gets turned off at the mains once it's finished it
powerdown
> > cycle.
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
** Sponsored by www.BERBLE.com **
all the Cool Stuff, in one Place
UKHA_D Main Index |
UKHA_D Thread Index |
UKHA_D Home |
Archives Home
|