RE: [OT] Outlook/exchange out of office replacement?

["Paul Gale" <groups2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Ah OK thanks.

Do you know if you can use wildcards in the dist list i.e. *@abc.com  ?

I'm running 2007. What kind of extra rules do you get on Outlook vs server
rules processing?

Thanks,

Paul.



> -----Original Message-----
> From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behalf
> Of Ian Lowe
> Sent: 27 July 2007 14:52
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] [OT] Outlook/exchange out of office replacement?
>
> I have a copy of Outlook running on my server console just to provide
> the
> extra rules that the full fat outlook client has over just exchange
> processing - what you are after can be done in Outlook 2007 (and I
> think
> 2003 as well).
>
>
>
> Don't add an "auto respond with this text" entry, but click
on the "Add
> Rule" button in OOO Assistant,
>
> Create an OOO rule from "From", and pick a distribution list
from your
> contacts folder (stick everyone you trust to see your out of office
> message
> in this list)
>
> As the action, choose "reply with template" and put your
normal out of
> office message in that template
>
>
>
> That's it  - if the rule matches, an OOO message is sent, if not, no
> response.
>
>
>
> Ian.
>
>
>
> From: Paul Gale [mailto:groups2@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 27 July 2007 13:50
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: [ukha_d] [OT] Outlook/exchange out of office replacement?
>
>
>
> Anyone know of or use a replacement for the Exchange/Outlook out of
> office
> responder?
>
> In these days of spam, sending a response to a spam message isn't a
> good
> idea - was wondering if there's a way of tailoring an OOO to only
reply
> to
> known contacts (maybe generated from sent emails)?
>
> Paul.
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
>