The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: MS Home Server


  • Subject: Re: MS Home Server
  • From: Jon Payne <jgpayne@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 19:44:43 +0000 (GMT)

I think it's great....

Apart from that it suffers from data corruption on accessing data on the
server in some circumstances (which I've suffered from). Backups are ok.

Until they fix this serious issue, that effectively prevents you from using
it as a file server, then it's useless as far as I'm concerned. I'm just
crossing by fingers until they do fix it :-(


----- Original Message ----
From: Steve Healey <steve.healey@xxxxxxx>
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, 18 January, 2008 12:55:36 PM
Subject: [ukha_d] MS Home Server

I know a number of you guys have been running the various beta version of
MS
Home Server and I wondered what the general feeling was?



I am replacing my rather large, 6 year old and over cumbersome storage
server with a NAS, probably a rack mounted Linksys, but I still need a
small
server to run a couple of applications. My first thought was to keep the
old
beast running but it does seem a waste of space and energy so I've have a
google around and found http://www.tranquilpc-shop.co.uk/
 and they do   what
looks like a very nice rack mountable solution with a very small footprint
and energy consumption



So the questions -



1.      Should I jump on the MS Home Server band wagon?

2.      Should I go for an off the shelf hardware solution or in the true
nature of HA pull my finger out and build one from scratch?



Many thanks,





Steve





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




UKHA_D Main Index | UKHA_D Thread Index | UKHA_D Home | Archives Home

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.