[Message Prev][Message
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message
Index][Thread Index]
Re: Whole House Audio schema
- Subject: Re: Whole House Audio schema
- From: Stuart Booth
- Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2004 21:58:00 +0000
On Sun, 08 Feb 2004 10:05:51 -0000, "mark_harrison_uk2"
<<a
href="/group/xap_automation/post?postID=0ZEvH4Ah7hrwlFT6nq3MmVxzD6B96jYVGMzzllOI8ivDXkuTCSLQCHQjb9NmTd-xTRnJ3qbARr31">mph@a...</a>>
wrote:
>1: The long name
>- "xAP Schema for MP3 Whole House Audio v2.2"
>Proposed name
>- "xAP Schema for Audio Control v2.3"
Works for me. I just picked "Whole House Audio" as that was what
we
were talking in terms of at the time. I can see that that title
extends to other areas though.
>At present, xap-audio.audio contains two allowable blocks:
>- audio.mute
>- audio.mixer
>I would like to add a third
>- audio.sourceselect
>{
> AVSource= <name>
>}
Since you repeat the "source" (sub)string, why not just call it:
xAP-audio.source
{
Select=<name>
}
Have said that, I like how "xAP-Audio.SourceSelect reads in comparison
to that.
Or how about:
{
Input=<name>
}
...to remove "select" from the message request?
I've no strong preferences either way, just a thought. We all write
differently.
S
--
Stuart Booth <<a
href="/group/xap_automation/post?postID=REt_qpv6qbyQDws-EIhVbeM2QU4_g2NO4b6nJcSoDvMthUqRMmyFsuHAdTS9dfNunNpM-Coxxg7F8K6WHQ">stuart@x...</a>>
xAPFramework.net - a xAP software development framework for .net
<a href="http://www.xapautomation.org/">http://www.xapautomation.org/</a>
<a href="http://www.xapframework.net/">http://www.xapframework.net/</a>
xAP_Automation Main Index |
xAP_Automation Thread Index |
xAP_Automation Home |
Archives Home
|