[Message Prev][Message
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message
Index][Thread Index]
RE: Telephony hardware (was xAP quiet?)
- Subject: RE: Telephony hardware (was xAP quiet?)
- From: "Paul Gale" <groups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 12:46:26 +0100
Thanks Patrick,
I just had a conversation with LinITX and will be ordering a single
SPA-3000 to test and play with :)
Do you have any timescales on getting your * xAP connector out?
Thanks,
Paul.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xap_automation@xxxxxxx
> [mailto:xap_automation@xxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Patrick Lidstone
> (Personal E-mail)
> Sent: 20 April 2005 11:55
> To: xap_automation@xxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [xap_automation] Telephony hardware (was xAP quiet?)
>
>
>
> >
> > So, in my current situation using 3x incoming analogue lines
> > and connecting to two analogue phones and a fax, I'd need 3x
> > SPA-3000? - This also looks like it'd be cheaper than buying
> > the relevant TDM400's with FXS and FXO ports (2 cards yes?).
>
>
> I would start with a single SPA-3000 and see how you get on.
>
> You would need two TDM400's, yes, and the FXO ports don't work in the
UK
> anyway at present - they don't detect call hangup correctly.
>
> > I could also utilise my (currently unused) Home Highway
> > digital number (obviously with the limit of 2x
> > incoming/outgoing calls at any one time).
> >
> > I just spoke to BT and the difference in costs between home
> > highway and business highway is massive + call rates
> > significantly more - for not a lot of extra benefit! So I'll
> > stay with home highway I think.
>
> Yes, it's infuriating!
>
> If you get stuck, feel free to give me a shout.
>
> Patrick
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
xAP_Automation Main Index |
xAP_Automation Thread Index |
xAP_Automation Home |
Archives Home
|