[Message Prev][Message
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message
Index][Thread Index]
Re: xAP embedded CallerID device
- Subject: Re: xAP embedded CallerID device
- From: "turner228" <kevin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2008 18:05:19 -0000
Max beat me to it
Are you teasing us Kevin ?
I thought you were going to tell me you had cracked the MSS100!
Kevin T
--- In xap_automation@xxxxxxx, Kevin Hawkins=20
<yahoogroupskh@...> wrote:
>
> Sorry - just received this post !! .
>=20
> This was something I did that uses an off the shelf embedded=20
device=20
> - (circa =A350) nicely cased with a serial port. I wrote some xAP=20
code=20
> and I had my Meteor attached to it directly. It does much the same=20
as=20
> xAPTel in the Meteor context - ie it doesn't offer the Skype=20
options or=20
> the ability to dial etc but provides a full set of call progress=20
> messages and the outgoing dialled digit detection too. Actually=20
as=20
> each digit is reported as it is dialled you can use specific=20
sequences=20
> to trigger xAP events should you want eg turn all your lights off=20
by=20
> dialling #8 or something - turn them on if dialling 999.
>=20
> The devices are programmed in a basic style language so you could=20
use=20
> them for anything really - and there's a quad port versions too.=20
Anyone=20
> is welcome to my xAP source code... it's dead easy to then just add=20
in=20
> serial handling for your own XYZ device.=20=20
>=20
> I now have a quad port handling my alarm, my AV amplifer , the=20
Meteor=20
> and a video/audio matrix switcher. Single port units are around=20
=A350=20
> from memory and the cased quad ports around =A3120. These are=20
available=20
> as just boards for considerably less.
>=20
> Kevin
>=20
> PS Whilst you're there Kevin I have been revisiting my xAP BSC=20
Framework=20
> code that I think you may have used in a couple of projects .=20=20=20
I've=20
> found a couple of ignificant things that are wrong with it so if=20
you=20
> have used that code then you probably have the same issues ! A few=20
of=20
> the issues were due to the transition from Patricks OCX to J's=20
Intranet=20
> OCX. Give us a shout if you are still actively using it,=20
>=20
>=20
> turner228 wrote:
> >
> > "and I'm using the xAP embedded CallerID device" ??
> >
> > Do tell.....
> >
> > Kevin T
> >
> >
>
------------------------------------
xAP_Automation Main Index |
xAP_Automation Thread Index |
xAP_Automation Home |
Archives Home
|