RE: Should we support XPL bridging?

[Ian B]

A couple of the guys asked me if I would be supporting xPL natively on my
IO
controller. Since I have not been directly involved in the toing, froing
and
bad feeling around this I saw no reason not to. There is also the argument
that if I sell more boards it is more money to put into the next project.
As
with Keith (and others) this has to be considered.

Finally, being a software addition there is no additional production costs
so it can be added at almost any time.

Ian



>-----Original Message-----
>From: Patrick Lidstone [mailto:<a
href="/group/xAP_developer/post?postID=1XRkvkOznmQjdvAglxYefoFkUdl5JUaLL6MgMSBZUjBh8IL2y8kcL3C2vKb3wKvQxgT-TFZTtAsQ_Kac">patrick@l...</a>]
>Sent: 24 May 2003 17:59
>To: <a
href="/group/xAP_developer/post?postID=WsUqhWAk44GKISnKXRwqJS430fmRSt9BbRkXTeONaHti2mdbMeeTkRTih46npGxwBx6fxvANN6a_JHgAlyiZilYXs8Y7C2g">xAP_developer@xxxxxxx</a>
>Subject: [xAP_developer] Should we support XPL bridging?
>
>
>If XPL were to move to a different port, we could potentially bridge
>the xAP and XPL worlds, subject to the basic limitations imposed by
>the XPL being a subset of xAP.
>
>Is there any interest in this? Personally I'm ambivalent, but I'm
>happy to write the code if people want an even broader choice of apps.
>
>Any thoughts?
>
>Patrick
>
>
>
>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
><a
href="/group/xAP_developer/post?postID=B1XwFKKPWWn2BcRBM-FMAQUbhvQ0RWhKyP08-LtsWXQ-cMyAOFFn1x2esw59PG4MXjjICRVqC9Feguma5ZCUVVuJ3PQW_ivbEv9CIFSdVDMPGA">xAP_developer-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx</a>
>
>
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to <a href="http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/";>http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/</a>
>
>
>