[Message Prev][Message
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message
Index][Thread Index]
Re: xAP & SlimServer
- Subject: Re: xAP & SlimServer
- From: Stuart Booth
- Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 21:52:00 +0000
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004 17:26:04 +0000, Stuart Poulton
<<a
href="/group/xAP_developer/post?postID=2wIhhEJfyU9fucam_T7ymUf5G_lBqN78c6uj66tLKw1W8nYFnLhYhkmC_Ni6Nv0dLng2YFugWlg5FldpCPkgVFyWlw">stuart.poulton@a...</a>>
wrote:
>How should Slim's be addressed.
>
>I'm currently using the following
>
>SlimServer : SlimDevices.sliMP3.server
>Lounge : SlimDevices.sliMP3.lounge
>Java : SlimDevices.sliMP3.java
The above is the method I preferred initially. Oh, that should be
SlimDevi rather than SlimDevices.
>But should this actually be as follows
>
>SlimServer : SlimDevices.sliMP3.server
>Lounge : SlimDevices.sliMP3.server:lounge
>Java : SlimDevices.sliMP3.server:java
But this one above is the mechanism I employ these days.
The latter does mean you can use entirely different implementations
simply by changing the target address, maintaining the consistency of
the subaddress.
The latter also means you could operate multiple SlimServers (for
whatever reason) and thus support non-unique Slim names across the
entire xAP network.
The former also has that slight confusion where "server" is the
SlimServer itself, and "lounge", on the same addressing level, is
a
Slim device.
There have been other rumblings on this topic that you have just
reminded me of.
S
--
Stuart Booth <<a
href="/group/xAP_developer/post?postID=8FoXES1JkqwYhh3ykJnQkLx8LbNzG8Uhy7P_BM-wXztf7kSglcSYq_GGCOuP3QkUPsfR76-8eY8-gJXT_oE">stuart@x...</a>>
xAPFramework.net - a xAP software development framework for .net
<a href="http://www.xapautomation.org/">http://www.xapautomation.org/</a>
<a href="http://www.xapframework.net/">http://www.xapframework.net/</a>
xAP_Development Main Index |
xAP_Development Thread Index |
xAP_Development Home |
Archives Home
|