The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Appearance of 'DOH!' in xplRIOnet Web Interface


  • Subject: Re: Appearance of 'DOH!' in xplRIOnet Web Interface
  • From: "craigssullivan" <craigssullivan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 18:26:30 -0000

re web.xml - thanks, I'll investigate that...

re the receiver.arf file - is it possible then to use the original=20
one with the xplRionet server running?

--- In ukha_xpl@xxxxxxx, "Tony Tofts" <tony@x> wrote:
> > I've been using this happily for a couple of weeks now and=20
> > have noticed this week that, when accessing the web interface=20
> > to control my Rio devices the word 'DOH!' appears in place of=20
> > some of the image controls in the playlist and also in place=20
> > of the Rio status text.=20
> >=20
> > It has happened for me before and I ended up having to=20
> > re-install xplRionet completely. I haven't moved or modified=20
> > any of the images since they were last visible in the web=20
> > interface. Anyone else having this problem?
>=20
> The DOH! Text means it can't find an entry in web.xml to match a=20
{name}
> parameter on the web page
>=20
> Please can you cross check your web.xml against the web page, and=20
try
> opening the web.xml in IE to check it's not corrupt
>=20
> A missing image won't cause it, you'll just get a broken link, it=20
can only
> happen if a {param} is missing from web.xml
>=20
> > Oh, and one other thing; has anyone using this for their Rios=20
> > noticed any degradation in sound quality between this and the=20
> > standard Rio software? It seems to me as though there is=20
> > slightly less in the lower frequencies when using xplRionet=20
> > verses the standard client. Is there any reason why this=20
> > would be the case?
>=20
> Xplrionet purely passes the mp3 file to the client, it does=20
nothing to the
> file so can't effect it
>=20
> The receiver.arf used by xplrionet isn't the same one used by the=20
standard
> software, so any issue must lie here I guess.
>=20
> The client used was selected on the basis of extra functionality=20
(over the
> original client) that many users wanted (including native ogg/flac=20
support).
>=20
> Can't say I have a good enough ear to spot what you mention, maybe=20
others
> can?
>=20
> Regards
> Tony






xPL Main Index | xPL Thread Index | xPL Home | Archives Home

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.