The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re: Standalone xPL Hub Summary, Mark II



This will be fairly easy for the .net framework too.  I can have a
look at it this weekend.  Unless John B tells me to "stay
off!"...

Tom

On 9/16/05, Gerry Duprey <gerry@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> > I don't think so - to my mind, the application should act as if
there is
> > a hub present anyway. I think that an app should *always* assume
that a
> > hub is present and in essence, not give it any other thought.
>
> I think this is an OK assumption, as long as the app isn't going to
break.
> Since you can always send xPL messages, hub or not, nothing it
technically
> in the way.  However, the underlying framework should provide some
sort of
> check to see if a hub has been detected or not (like you can ask if
you've
> been configured or not) so for an app that chooses not to send
messages
> until the hub is active, it has something to make that decision from.
>
> > One thing also - the suggested timings have to be worded as
"suggested
> > values", not as a protocol breaking rule. There would be a
lot of work
> > involved in re-writing existing code, and I think that time would
be
> > better spent on new developments!
>
> I'll make it suggested in the next version.  However, I have to say, I
was
> surprised at how easy this change was to make to the xPL4Java
framework.
> Only took about 30 minutes to code it and do initial testing.  I want
to do
> more testing, but it was pretty easy.
>
> I've also re-done my xPL hub (for linux) so it now has a supervisory
> function that insures it's running and if it stops, relaunches it. 
That
> took about 30 minutes too.
>
> It's one of the things I really appreciate about this solution.  The
change
> is pretty easy to accomplish.
>
> While I understand if folks don't have time to implement it completely
in
> various frameworks, I would hope that an version with any automatic
hub
> removed could happen quickly -- once this gets "official",
the clearer the
> apps work, the quicker the "transition" period will be.
>
> Gerry
>
> --
> Gerry Duprey
> Ann Arbor, MI 48103
> http://www.cdp1802.org
>
>
> xPL Links: http://www.xplproject.org.uk http://www.xplhal.com
> http://www.xpl.myby.co.uk
> To Post a Message: ukha_xpl@xxxxxxx
> To Subscribe:  ukha_xpl-subscribe@xxxxxxx
> To Unsubscribe:  ukha_xpl-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
>
>
> ________________________________
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
>  Visit your group "ukha_xpl" on the web.
>
>  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>  ukha_xpl-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
>
>  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>  ukha_xpl-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
>
>  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
> ________________________________
>



xPL Main Index | xPL Thread Index | xPL Home | Archives Home

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.