> It most
> definately was the "server" chip offering, being the only
one (at the
time)
> that supported multi-processor configurations.
Ah...I'm not going daft in my old age then.
Thanks for confirming.
M.
Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use
this contact form
. Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control
over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed
to the relevant mailing list.