|
The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024
|
Latest message you have seen: OT:Ebuyer weekend deals |
[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
Re: PIR Options
I trialled a few different PIR's for the same use (there's been a
lot of discussion about this on here before). I wanted the 'perfect
PIR' that had to meet the following criteria:
1) Quick triggering
2) Stable so as not to give false alarms when used as security PIR
3) Looks good
4) Ability to turn On/Off LED
5) Interchangeable Lens for wide/curtain mode detection.
Point 1 is normally part dealt with by user selectable 'pulse count'
i.e. how many detection pattern 'beams' need to be broken to trigger
and the internal logic used by the detector (and how quick it is).
Generally it is best to go for a sensor that allows a pulse count of
between 1 and 4, although most will start at 2 for stability (low
false-alarm) reasons.
I must say that I have still not found the ideal sensor - I have a
combination of:
Alarmcom IR120C - look really good, use great 'black mirror'
technology (cutting down susceptibility to sunlight and other
unwanted radiation) and are very stable but a little slow to trigger
+ they are fairly cheap trade.
Pyronix Magnum Ultra - (existing PIR's in my house) - OKish looking,
seem quite stable and have selectable 1/2/3 pulse count making it a
bit quicker to trigger when on 1.
Optex RX-40QZ - Recommended by Comfort but I've not tried this yet -
only 2/4 pulse count and detection area doesn't look very dense.
I think the detection area density is also important. This is the
pattern of 'detection beams' that spread out from the sensor and how
closely they are spaced. The lower the density, the further you will
have to move to trigger the sensor (depending on pulse count). This
is especially important if you want to detect occupancy in, say, the
living room where you may sit on a sofa for longish periods of time.
A high-density pattern and propper alignment of the PIR will help
here although you cannot guarantee that the sensor will pick up
small movements.
Someone mentioned a dual tech sensor on here a while ago. Generally
these are no good as their trigger time is pretty poor (long). They
use a combination of IR detection and microwaves. This particular
sensor gave separate outputs for both sensors, allowing the
(quicker) microwave technology to be used on it's own. The microwave
bit can be difficult as it will apparently sense through walls
(although I've not tried one) - so siteing is important. Anyone use
these - I'd love to hear if it's successful.
Paul.
--- In ukha_d@y..., "Amar Nagi" <amar@a...> wrote:
>
> I have homeseer, ocelot and I want to set up sensors around my
flat to
> indicate when a room is occupied. What are my options ? I get a
bit
> confused
> by the range of different sensors (Pir)
>
> Any recommend anything ? I don't really want to go for the RF x10
route
>
> Ps sorry I used the wrong subject line b4.
Yahoo! Groups
Sponsor |
ADVERTISEMENT
|
|
For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|
|