RE: Lossless Compression Help!

["Mark Harrison" <Mark.Harrison@xxxxxxx>]

Title: Re: [ukha_d] Lossless Compression Help!

Jason,

 

This kind of personal abuse is exactly what this group has managed to avoid for the 5 years that I've been a member.

 

Kindly desist, or find another group where this kind of behaviour is acceptable.

 

Mark Harrison

-----Original Message-----
From: Jason Lee [mailto:jasonjlee@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Tue 28/05/2002 13:36
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Cc:
Subject: Re: [ukha_d] Lossless Compression Help!

Read his last post.

Ken does not accept that lossless video compression is possible.

I gave him the link, 3 posts ago which he chose not to read...
http://math.berkeley.edu/~benrg/huffyuv.html

I have stated 3 times. but here goes.

I capture with a lossless compression codec to a raid array with
showshifter.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Harrison" <Mark.Harrison@xxxxxxx>
To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 1:29 PM
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Lossless Compression Help!


> Tony,
>
> Everyone understands this.
>
> The confusion comes because someone (Jason?) said that they _captured_
losslesly...
>
> ... when it was asked how (ie - did they have a decoder with a digital
out), this got modified to "No - I capture in analogue, and use lossless
compression of that".)
>
> Then the shouting began.
>
> M.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: BUTLER, Tony, FM [mailto:tony.butler@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tue 28/05/2002 13:23
> To: 'ukha_d@xxxxxxx'
> Cc:
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Lossless Compression Help!
>
>
>
> > >> Yes, but the compression also removes certain elements of
> > the original
> > >> and this has been the whole basis of the argument over
> > whether analogue
> > >> or digital is better for audio for many a long year.
>
> Pkzip etc use compression where, yes, data is removed - otherwise it would
> not be compressed!!
> BUT at decompression, that data is recovered to create an exact copy of
the
> original.
> With Jpeg/mpeg2 etc, data is removed that CANNOT be recreated - is this
why
> there appears to be some confusion?
> BOTH methods do lose data when the file is compreseed, but one of them can
> recover that data.
>
>
> Tony
>
>
> ********************************************************************
>       Visit our Internet site at http://www.rbsmarkets.com
>
> This e-mail is intended only for the addressee named above.
> As this e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information,
> if you are not the named addressee, you are not authorised to
> retain, read, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it.
> ********************************************************************
>
>
> For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx> Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx> Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx> List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan
> service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working
> around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
>
>



------------------------