The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

Latest message you have seen: RE: Re: OT Surge Protected Extension Leads - fail PAT test??!!??! Any ideas


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Widescreen monitors?


  • To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: Widescreen monitors?
  • From: "Paul Gale" <groups@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 10:07:29 -0000
  • Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx

In that particular mode, the desktop is stretched across all three monitors= , running something like 3840 x 1024. The wallpaper dimensions are similar = and simply applied and stretched as normal. Sounds like you're running inde= pendent screen res on each monitor? I see that when running just two monito= rs on the Matrox G450 card (and want max screen res on each).

Paul.

-----Original Message-----
From: Ian Lowe [mailto:ian@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 16 November 2002 13:47
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Widescreen monitors?

Paul, how did you get a different image on each desktop??

I have two monitors on XP, a 22" iiyama VMPro510, and a relisys LCD, a= nd the
only thing which annoys me is having a "mini" version of my main = wallpaper
displayed on the LCD.

I have a bunch of panoramic photos which are just begging to be used as a desktop ;)

Ian.

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Gale [mailto:groups@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 16 November 2002 12:05
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Widescreen monitors?


= http://www.siliconpixel.com/HomeAutomation/images/monitors.jpg



This shows my Sony FW900 and two Iiyama VM Pro 454's. All three run off a Matrox Parhelia 'Triplehead' card.



The Sony is around =A31000 and the Iiyama's =A3250 (excellent value 19"= ; monitors
with superb picture).



The Sony likes 1920x1200 best.



I've also got a KVM switch so I can jump over to my Video Edit PC's (which<= BR> run a dual head config).



SERIOUS desktop space - I'd never go back to anything else!



Paul.



-----Original Message-----
From: Ray Barnett [mailto:lists@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 16 November 2002 10:38
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Widescreen monitors?



Mark, You might want to look at the Sony FW900 CRT too - it's a 24" mo= nitor
with 16:1 ratio running at 1920X1200. No idea on price. They also do a
really really nice widescreen TFT too. Again no idea on price or how good i= t
is - I happened to spot them whilst browsing just now.

With respect to dual head: I use that at the moment from XP and do really like it. I like having two windows open that I'm working from, like a
development window and a help page, and dual head works really well for
this - since you can maximise each window within a display without faffing<= BR> to arrange windows. Windows Remote Desktop works well with it too and force= s
all the apps on to the single screen of my laptop when I connect to my
desktop remotely. Apps like VNC and Radmin aren't quite so clever about thi= s
though. Not all applications properly understand dual head either - it's nice to move toolbars away from the main screen, but this doesn't always work well (although this might be a consequence of running the two monitors=
at different resolutions).

Ray Barnett.
  -----Original Message-----
  From: Des Gibbons [mailto:des@xxxxxxx]
  Sent: 16 November 2002 10:22
  To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx   Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Widescreen monitors?


  Price wise it definitely is.

  You don't need a dual head card tho if you are using XP, it supports= two
  video cards iirc.

  Mind you I've not tried it personally so it might be a pile of poo w= ith
all
  sorts of problems ;)

  Cheers, Des.

  > -----Original Message-----
  > From: Mark Harrison [mailto:Mark.Harrison@xxxxxxx]
  > Sent: Saturday, November 16, 2002 10:08
  > To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx   > Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Widescreen monitors?
  >
  >
  > Thanks... that's the kind of thing.
  >
  > Hmm.... maybe two conventionals next to each other with a
  > dual-head card is still the say to go :-(
  >
  > M.
  >
  > -----Original Message-----
  > From: Graham Kiff [mailto:graham.kiff@xxxxxxx]
  > Sent: 15 November 2002 23:01
  > To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx   > Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Widescreen monitors?
  >
  >
  > Mark
  >
  > The Optoma L17 is actually 1280 x 768, acpect ratio of 1.666, j= ust short
  > (well narrow) of 16:9 (1.778)
  >
  > Cheers
  > Graham
  >
  > -----Original Message-----
  > From: Mark Harrison [mailto:Mark.Harrison@xxxxxxx]
  > Sent: 15 November 2002 20:17
  > To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx   > Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Widescreen monitors?
  >
  >
  > Hmmm.... I was hoping that widescreen also meant wide-resolutio= n :-(
  >
  > Ho hum.
  >
  > M.
  >
  > -----Original Message-----
  > From: Tony T [mailto:tony@xxxxxxx]
  > Sent: 15 November 2002 19:45
  > To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx   > Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Widescreen monitors?
  >
  >
  > >
  > > Sorry... I really meant PC monitors rather than TVs.
  > >
  > > Only one of those was a widescreen monitor, and that was   > > three grand :-(
  > >
  >
  > The optoma (whoever they are) is 17" 1024x768 w/s
  > Video & PC/Mac monitor for =A3859+vat?
  >
  > Not sure you'll get a widescreen much cheaper?
  >
  > Regards
  > Tony
  >
  >
  >
  > http://www.automated= home.co.uk
  > Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx   > Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx   > Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx   > List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx   >
  > List of UKHA Groups here -
http://groups.ya= hoo.com/group/UKHA_Grouplists/
  >
  > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/te= rms/
  >
  >
  >
  > _______________________________________________________________= _________
  > This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs = SkyScan
  > service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service= working
  > around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com
  > _______________________________________________________________= _________
  >
  >
  > http://www.automated= home.co.uk
  > Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx   > Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx   > Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx   > List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx   >
  > List of UKHA Groups here -
http://groups.ya= hoo.com/group/UKHA_Grouplists/
  >
  > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/te= rms/
  >
  >
  >
  >
  >
  >
  > http://www.automated= home.co.uk
  > Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx   > Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx   > Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx   > List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx   >
  > List of UKHA Groups here -
http://groups.ya= hoo.com/group/UKHA_Grouplists/
  >
  > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/te= rms/
  >
  >
  >
  > _______________________________________________________________= _________
  > This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs = SkyScan
  > service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service= working
  > around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com
  > _______________________________________________________________= _________
  >
  > http://www.automated= home.co.uk
  > Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx   > Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx   > Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx   > List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx   >
  > List of UKHA Groups here -
http://groups.ya= hoo.com/group/UKHA_Grouplists/
  >
  > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/te= rms/
  >
  >
  >


  http://www.automatedhome.= co.uk
  Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx   Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx   Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx   List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
  List of UKHA Groups here - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/UKHA_Grouplists/

  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.=



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]







Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.