The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

Latest message you have seen: Re: Introduction to myself


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: RJ45 CAT5e plugs



Were they Cat5e capable? Does it really matter even with Gigabit
networking=
?

=20

Can anyone explain the differences a cheap vs expensive plug makes in real
=
terms?=20

=20

Paul.

=20

-----Original Message-----
From: Stuart Worrall [mailto:stuart@xxxxxxx]=20
Sent: 12 March 2003 00:16
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] RJ45 CAT5e plugs

=20

Don't know about amp but I bought a trade pack of 100 from our local
B&Q
warehouse for =A312.98 the other day

Probably cheaper on the net somewhere but I needed them the same day.

Thanks

Stu Worrall
stu@xxxxxxx
worrallst@xxxxxxx

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Gale [mailto:p-gale@xxxxxxx]=20
> Sent: 03 March 2003 11:47
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: [ukha_d] RJ45 CAT5e plugs
>=20
>=20
> When I started my CAT5 wiring about a year ago, I bought 100=20
> CAT5e AMP plugs. I'm now through them and need to buy some=20
> more. I don't know what the original AMP part number was but=20
> they came in two parts - the clear plug and a black insert so=20
> you can line up the conductors easily before inserting into=20
> the plug. Seems like a good system to me. I think it'd be=20
> very difficult without them.
>=20
> I've not used any other type of plug but when searching the=20
> RS and Lindy web sites, can't see any reference to these=20
> little inserts.
>=20
> Anyone know if this is a common/unusual system? Is it=20
> easy/difficult to use plugs that don't have this=20
> (particularly when trying to unwind pairs and get them all in=20
> the right positions)?
>=20
> Paul.
>=20
>=20=20







Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.