The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

Latest message you have seen: RE: Mv1000 camera issue


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re: Cat5 cabling



Rob,

I'm sure there is a standard, but I didnt use it consciously.  Looking at
the plugs so you can see the metal contacts on both plugs, I just wired the
4 colours from the phone plug parallel to the middle 4 of the RJ45.  What I
am calling baluns is the top picture here: http://tinyurl.com/btkd  This
company calls them tailed voice adaptors...  We use them at work for the
structured cabling, which I assume was wired in to a cat5 standard, so my
'adaptor' working with these implies that (apart from the solid cores) was
to standard.

Matthew

----- Original Message -----
From: "sh33pdip" <rjl@xxxxxxx>



> Thanks Matthew, that's what I thought.
>
> Is there any standard for the configuration of the colours/pins (for
> the baluns)?
>
> Rob
>
> --- In ukha_d@xxxxxxx, "Matthew Norman" <mafiu@n...>
wrote:
> > I cut the bt phone plug off the end of an old phone and crimped a
> RJ45 on
> > the spare end.  I used the 4 middle conductors of the rj45 and
> this was
> > compatible with the phone baluns (rj45 to phone socket) that I
had
> aquired.
> >
> > The phone wire core was not solid, and so should not technically
be
> > compatible with the rj45 IDC connectors, but its worked for about
> a year
> > now, apart from the time that I accidently patched my ethernet
> segment into
> > bt and the phones stopped working.....(!)
> >
> > Matthew



Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.