RE: HD Video Editing

[Paul Gale <groups2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I've only looked recently at the higher end gamer boards - Asus always
wins for me. I went for a Rampage III which has been excellent so far. I
used to run a Tyan dual quad Xeon but decided on the cheaper (by far!) i7
six core - blows away the older Xeon (8 core total) PC :)

I'm sure the cheaper mid range Asus boards would be good too - biggest
factor on performance is the actual CPU, ram size and speed and speed of
HDD's. Many people I know who are into serious edit PC building favour
Samsung spinpoint F1's currently as they're big, cheap and fast -
especially in raid arrays.

I have an SSD - one of the bigger ones on another W7 PC - has certainly
sped up the OS loading, app performance by a big factor. But they're not
good for everything - can still be significantly slower on random access
with tons of small files although their sequential performance is
excellent. VERY expensive though still :(

Paul.



-----Original Message-----
From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Stewart
Sent: 09 September 2010 11:54
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] HD Video Editing

Thanks Paul. Any thoughts/recommendations on motherboards?



regards

Stewart



From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Paul
Gale
Sent: 09 September 2010 11:48
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] HD Video Editing





I think any of the recent i5 and i7's (esp the faster ones) should stand
you in good stead

Paul.

-----Original Message-----
From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx <mailto:ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx
<mailto:ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>
] On Behalf Of Jamie Whitehorn
Sent: 08 September 2010 23:50
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx <mailto:ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] HD Video Editing

Hi Stuart,

I'm editing AVCHD from my Canon HS200. I use a i7 930 CPU on a Gigabyte
GA-X58A-UD3R motherboard with 6GB RAM and a pair of Intel 60GB SSDs. The
setup was primarily built to edit photos but also gets used to edit our
home videos. The software I use is Cyberlink PowerDirector 8 (I tried Adobe
Premiere Elements 8 but didn't really get on with it). The build was a
trade off of cost vs performance. I wanted the best bang for my bucks. I
really needed the performance to be quick because we can be editing a
thousand photos in a block and each second you take off the time it takes
to edit one photo saves you 16 minutes of the total.

OK, a fairly extreme system - though not as good as Paul's :-). But I found
one of the biggest differences was made by the SSDs. If the video files and
the temporary files are on the SSD things speed up alot. Obviously SSDs are
expensive and low capacity so as soon as we've finished editing we move the
video files off to normal disk. If you do decided to look at SSDs be sure
to read the reviews, not all are equal in performance.

HTH, Jamie


--------------- Original message --------------- Original msg sent Wed, 8
Sep 2010 21:19:52 +0000 by Paul Gale
>
>
> Hi Stuart,
>
> I run a video production company so know a bit ;) We use Adobe Master
> Suite CS5 mostly and some of our editors use Final Cut.
>
> What specifically did you want to know?
>
> HD editing is pretty taxing on the CPU and memory - especially
> consumer codec video like AVCHD. It really depends what software (and
> plugins etc) and what kind of editing you're doing (most
> importantly) and how fast you expect it to respond or playback
> smoothly.
>
> My latest edit PC is a bit of a monster (i7 975x with 34Gb ram and
> raid arrays etc) but even that has it's moments! Trouble is, the
> faster the PC, the more you tend to ask of it with multiple renders
> running in the background and editing at the same time!
>
> Paul.
>

------------------------------------