[Message Prev][Message
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message
Index][Thread Index]
RE: Asterisk - xAP
Thanks Greg, sounds good :)
Let us know how it goes and if you need any testing.
Cheers,
Paul.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xap_automation@xxxxxxx
> [mailto:xap_automation@xxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Gregg Liming
> Sent: 03 August 2005 12:52
> To: xap_automation@xxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [xap_automation] Asterisk - xAP
>=20
> Paul Gale wrote:
>=20
> >And a question to the kind people who replied to my post a few
weeks ago
> about developing some xAP Asterisk integration:
> >
> >I've been thinking a lot more about what my needs are and think
that one
> of the first areas for me would be the reporting of messages saved in
> voice mail.
> >
> >For example, I'd like to show the number of waiting voice mail
messages
> on some other HA system e.g. wall touch screen, computer etc.
> >
> >Will this kind of data be available via xAP?
> >
> >
> >
> The info is available from *; therefore, it could be exposed via xAP.
>=20
> I've begun prototyping an application that runs autonomous from *
(i.e.,
> it's not an AGI or FAGI) and connects via the manager interface over
> TCP. I am currently tracking initiated channels and their connection
in
> and out from "providers" (e.g., IAX, SIP, ZAP). In
addition, it's
> tracking event durations--which is important for satisfying the info
for
> various xAP schema messages.
>=20
> I've also implemented thread management so that heartbeats are
> maintained separate from the continuous listener connected via the *
> manager interface. What you are asking for would also require a new
> thread to perform periodic actions (e.g., check mailbox "x"
every "y"
> seconds--where y can be large as needed). There may be similar
actions
> such as "check provider x to confirm that it is still
available".
>=20
> I'm not yet passing this info out via xAP (just the simple heartbeats)
> as there's still more prototyping and implementation to go. I expect
it
> will be some weeks off until I have something that could be considered
> useful. The good news is that this approach is not intrusive to your
> extensions as is AGI/FAGI approaches and is (hoped to be) easier to
> implement.
>=20
> Gregg
>=20
> >Pretty important for me as I'm using Asterisk primarily as a
glorified
> answer machine! :)
> >
> >Paul.
> >
> >
> >
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: xap_automation@xxxxxxx
> >>[mailto:xap_automation@xxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Mark McCall
> >>Sent: 03 August 2005 11:26
> >>To: xap_automation@xxxxxxx
> >>Subject: [xap_automation] Asterisk - xAP
> >>
> >>I've just joined the ranks of the Asterisk/SPA3000/Cisco7960
users with
> >>lots
> >>of help from the guys on the #ukha IRC channel.
> >>
> >>Is there any tie-in with xAP and * yet? Any plans to allow
xAP
> >>Switchboard
> >>to catalogue VoIP calls thru * for example?
> >>
> >>Thanks
> >>
> >>M.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>Yahoo! Groups Links
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
xAP_Automation Main Index |
xAP_Automation Thread Index |
xAP_Automation Home |
Archives Home
|