The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

Latest message you have seen: Source of cat5 FTP cable?


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Asterisk progress



Hi Andy,

> I have not had a FWD user call me (iirc) on
> sip:andy@xxxxxxx ...(someone care to try?). So if you just set
> up a FWD account then you'll be able to call Dan, he will be able to
> call you and I will be able to call you but not you call me...
The problem with FWD I think is more from the legal point of vue.
It cannot let user to place calls outside the system because they don't
want
to be considered a telecommunication firm an then to be regulated....In
that
situation it cannot be free anymore.

This is my personal opinion, following some related discussion on the FWD
forum.
They have started some dialing plans to interconnect with some other
operators, but this for the reason to use only numbers (prefixes), not full
SIP addresses.

BR,
Dan


----- Original Message -----
From: "UKHA" <ukha@xxxxxxx>
To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2003 8:16 PM
Subject: Re: [ukha_d] Asterisk progress


> Li
>
> >That is good news. I got decidedly worried when Tim at Provu
started
> >talking about rack-mounted proxy units that cost tens of thousands
of
> >Pounds.
>
> If you explained what you were trying to achieve and that's what he
said
> then.... that's what we call bollocks in the trade (not that I'm
actually
> in the trade you understand). Ultimately, for what I'm assuming you
want
> to use this for, a simple proxy like partysip or ser will do you fine.
If
however
> you intend to run a service like FWD then Tim is right.
>
> >He told me that for VoIP, my two Snom phone are all I need to
start
> >talking. I was expecting the addition of the Asterisk server or
similar
as
> >well. So can I speak to you and Dan with my Snom phones alone?
>
> You can, well sort of. I actually have an issue with FWD, because I
> have a real proxy. So if you just sign up with FWD I can talk to you,
> but only if I call you. I have not had a FWD user call me (iirc) on
> sip:andy@xxxxxxx ...(someone care to try?). So if you just set
> up a FWD account then you'll be able to call Dan, he will be able to
> call you and I will be able to call you but not you call me...
> (are you lost yet?) If you set up your own sip proxy (eg
sip.laser.com)
> then you will be able to call me (and any other proper proxied sip
user),
> and I will be able to call you (as will any other proper proxied
user),
> you will be able to call any FWD user but they wont be able to call
you.
>
> >
> >Yes, I agree that it is a ridiculous number of IP addresses for
anybody.
> >We seem to have gone from a shortage of IP addresses to drowning
in them.
> >With the widespread use of NAT, the IPv4 shortage is easing
anyway.
>
> Well when the big corps turn to ipv6 maybe the rest of us will get
more
ipv4 ips?
> :D
>
> Andy
>
>
>
>
> ** UKHA2003 BE THERE! Details here:
http://www.automatedhome.co.uk/article.php3?story_id=1110
**
> http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
> List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>




Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.